Doing:
!access(...) == 0
Is equivalent to:
(!access(...)) == 0
Not:
!(access(...) == 0)
And throws this warning under clang:
mu-store.cc:77:6: warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand
side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
if (!access(xpath, F_OK) == 0) {
^ ~~
mu-store.cc:77:6: note: add parentheses after the '!' to evaluate the
comparison first
if (!access(xpath, F_OK) == 0) {
^
( )
mu-store.cc:77:6: note: add parentheses around left hand side expression
to silence this warning
if (!access(xpath, F_OK) == 0) {
^
( )
It ends up doing what the author intended anyway since access() returns
-1 on error, and !-1 == 0, but just do the more obvious check and check
that we don't get 0 here with !=.
Define mu4e-context - a structure with settings and enter/leave
functions for contexts, and some functions for switching between
contexts and auto-detecting them.
This 500 number was correct in v0.9.7-pre-302-g858552a, but since
v0.9.8.2-41-gc2e3eac it's been hardcoded to 1000 in the server code.
See also issue #715 and issue #716.
Right now we have this for showing the status of messages, e.g. whether
it has an attachment etc. But not for the "d", "D" etc. in the leftmost
column of the headers view.
This adds support for that, while bending over backwards to ensure that
anyone who's customized this in the past won't have their customizations
broken, i.e. like `mu4e-headers-trashed-mark` we can set this to a cons
cell of basic/fancy characters, but we also continue to support this
just being a string for existing users.
The next patch in this series adds a couple of non-ASCII characters to
be used for the trash / delete mark.
Because this was a lambda C-h m would just show "??" instead of the
function name, and the documentation would be really confusing since it
showed the deparsed lambda function instead of the function name being
called.
Fix this by refactoring both the view & headers [ and ] functions into
named functions, and make their shared logic new internal
mu4u~{headers,view}-* functions.
When user removes the In-Reply-To header, also remove the (hidden)
References header when sending the message, effectively making the
message appear at the top-level.
Mention in the doc, NEWS.
This is a long-standing feature, it works, but there was no mention of
it in the docs.
There's also bodyhtml:* but that doesn't seem to do anything for me,
maybe I just don't have enough HTML mail.
These also exist:
path,l ???
refs,r ???
But I don't know what they're for. They should probably be documented
too.
