mu4e: mention database-caching in FAQ
As a reason for discrepancies between mu and mu4e results; as per #2741.
This commit is contained in:
@ -4070,6 +4070,11 @@ answers.
|
|||||||
and @t{mu4e} should yield the same results. If they differ, this is
|
and @t{mu4e} should yield the same results. If they differ, this is
|
||||||
usually because one of the following reasons:
|
usually because one of the following reasons:
|
||||||
@itemize
|
@itemize
|
||||||
|
@item Database caching:
|
||||||
|
changes in @t{mu4e} are not immediately visible in the command-line @t{mu},
|
||||||
|
since it can take a while before changes are committed to disk (for performance
|
||||||
|
reasons). Note that quitting @t{mu4e} or invoking @t{mu4e-update-mail-and-index}
|
||||||
|
and @t{mu4e-update-index} trigger committing to disk as a side-effect.
|
||||||
@item different options:
|
@item different options:
|
||||||
@t{mu4e} defaults to having @t{mu4e-headers-include-related}, and
|
@t{mu4e} defaults to having @t{mu4e-headers-include-related}, and
|
||||||
@t{mu4e-headers-results-limit} set to 500. However, the command-line
|
@t{mu4e-headers-results-limit} set to 500. However, the command-line
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user