From c99ccf9a19dee787cddb609ca9890dc5503c5cfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mjn Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 13:18:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Lightly copyedit the documentation and docstrings --- man/mu-find.1 | 2 +- mu4e/mu4e-mark.el | 8 ++++---- mu4e/mu4e.texi | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/mu-find.1 b/man/mu-find.1 index 738d24f5..345befc9 100644 --- a/man/mu-find.1 +++ b/man/mu-find.1 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ of the message, as listed in the following table: p,passed Passed ('Handled') r,replied Replied s,seen Seen - t,thrashed Marked for deletion + t,trashed Marked for deletion a,attach Has attachment z,signed Signed message x,encrypted Encrypted message diff --git a/mu4e/mu4e-mark.el b/mu4e/mu4e-mark.el index 8ce0b177..10a84a09 100644 --- a/mu4e/mu4e-mark.el +++ b/mu4e/mu4e-mark.el @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ The following marks are available, and the corresponding props: `flag' n mark this message for flagging `move' y move the message to some folder `read' n mark the message as read - `trash' y thrash the message to some folder + `trash' y trash the message to some folder `unflag' n mark this message for unflagging `untrash' n remove the 'trashed' flag from a message `unmark' n unmark this message @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ user which one)." mu4e~mark-map)))) (defun mu4e~mark-check-target (target) - "Check if the target exists if not, offer to create it." + "Check if the target exists; if not, offer to create it." (let ((fulltarget (concat mu4e-maildir target))) (if (not (mu4e-create-maildir-maybe fulltarget)) (mu4e-error "Target dir %s does not exist " fulltarget) @@ -298,9 +298,9 @@ user which one)." After the actions have been executed succesfully, the affected messages are *hidden* from the current header list. Since the headers are the result of a search, we cannot be certain that the -messages no longer matches the current one - to get that +messages no longer match the current one - to get that certainty, we need to rerun the search, but we don't want to do -that automatically, as it may be too slow and/or break the users +that automatically, as it may be too slow and/or break the user's flow. Therefore, we hide the message, which in practice seems to work well. diff --git a/mu4e/mu4e.texi b/mu4e/mu4e.texi index e7ba8b01..4a243720 100644 --- a/mu4e/mu4e.texi +++ b/mu4e/mu4e.texi @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ W toggle include-related marking ------- d mark for moving to the trash folder -= mark for remove thrash flags ('untrash') += mark for removing trash flag ('untrash') DEL,D mark for complete deletion m mark for moving to another maildir folder r mark for refiling @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ M-right next query marking ------- d mark for moving to the trash folder -= mark for remove thrash flags ('untrash') += mark for removing trash flag ('untrash') DEL,D mark for complete deletion m mark for moving to another maildir folder r mark for refiling @@ -1836,12 +1836,12 @@ previous/next queries, you can use @kbd{M-x mu4e-headers-forget-queries}. It can be useful to narrow existing search results, that is, to add some clauses to the current query to match fewer messages. -For example, suppose you're looking at the some mailing list, perhaps by +For example, suppose you're looking at some mailing list, perhaps by jumping to a maildir (@kbd{M-x mu4e-headers-jump-to-maildir}, @key{j}) or because you followed some bookmark (@kbd{M-x mu4e-headers-search-bookmark}, @key{b}). Now, you want to narrow things down to only those messages that have attachments. -1 + This is when @kbd{M-x mu4e-headers-search-narrow} (@key{/}) comes in handy. It asks for an additional search pattern, which is appended to the current search query, in effect getting you the subset of the currently shown headers that