indexer: make lazy check even lazier

In lazy-mode, we were skipping directories that did not change; however,
this didn't help for the case were users received new messages in big
maildirs.

So, add another check where we compare the ctime of message files with
the time of the last indexing operation. If it's smaller, ignore the
message-file. This is faster than having to consult the Xapian database
for each message.

Note that this requires in mu4e:
      (setq mu4e-index-lazy-check t)
or
   --lazy-check
as a parameter for 'mu index'.

lib/mu-indexer.cc

@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ struct Indexer::Private {
 	std::mutex lock_, w_lock_;
 	std::atomic<time_t> completed_{};
 	bool was_empty_{};
+
+	uint64_t last_index_{};
 };
 
 bool
@@ -206,12 +208,16 @@ Indexer::Private::handler(const std::string& fullpath, struct stat* statbuf,
 
 	case Scanner::HandleType::File: {
 		++progress_.checked;
-
+		if (conf_.lazy_check && static_cast<uint64_t>(statbuf->st_ctime) < last_index_) {
-		if ((size_t)statbuf->st_size > max_message_size_) {
+			// in lazy mode, ignore the file if it has not changed
-			mu_debug("skip {} (too big: {} bytes)", fullpath, statbuf->st_size);
+			// since the last indexing op.
 			return false;
 		}
 
+		if (static_cast<size_t>(statbuf->st_size) > max_message_size_) {
+			mu_debug("skip {} (too big: {} bytes)", fullpath, statbuf->st_size);
+			return false;
+		}
 		// if the message is not in the db yet, or not up-to-date, queue
 		// it for updating/inserting.
 		if (statbuf->st_ctime <= dirstamp_ && store_.contains_message(fullpath))
@@ -414,6 +420,10 @@ Indexer::Private::start(const Indexer::Config& conf, bool block)
 	mu_debug("indexing: {}; clean-up: {}", conf_.scan ? "yes" : "no",
 		 conf_.cleanup ? "yes" : "no");
 
+	// remember the _previous_ indexing, so in lazy mode we can skip
+	// those files.
+	last_index_ = store_.config().get<Mu::Config::Id::LastIndex>();
+
 	state_.change_to(IndexState::Scanning);
 	/* kick off the first worker, which will spawn more if needed. */
 	workers_.emplace_back(std::thread([this] { item_worker(); }));

lib/mu-indexer.hh

@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ public:
 		bool ignore_noupdate{};
 		/**< ignore .noupdate files */
 		bool lazy_check{};
-		/**< whether to skip directories that don't have a changed
+		/**< whether to skip directories or message files that haven't changed since the
-		 * mtime */
+		 * previous indexing operation, based on their ctime */
 	};
 
 	/**

man/mu-index.1.org

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ If there is a file called _.noupdate_ in a directory, the contents of that
 directory and all of its subdirectories will be ignored. This can be useful to
 speed up things you have some maildirs that never change.
 
-_.noupdate_ does not affect already-indexed message: you can still search for
+_.noupdate_ does not affect already-indexed messages: you can still search for
 them. _.noupdate_ is ignored when you start indexing with an empty database (such
 as directly after *mu init*).
 
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ the database for which there is no longer a corresponding file in the Maildir.
 If you do not want this, you can use *-n*, *--nocleanup*.
 
 When *mu index* catches one of the signals *SIGINT*, *SIGHUP* or *SIGTERM* (e.g., when
-you press Ctrl-C during the indexing process), it attempts to shutdown
+you press *Ctrl-C* during the indexing process), it attempts to shutdown
 gracefully; it tries to save and commit data, and close the database etc. If it
 receives another signal (e.g., when pressing Ctrl-C once more), *mu index* will
 terminate immediately.
@@ -67,12 +67,17 @@ terminate immediately.
 
 ** --lazy-check
 In lazy-check mode, *mu* does not consider messages for which the time-stamp
-(ctime) of the directory they reside in has not changed since the previous
+(*ctime*) of the directory in which they reside, has not changed since the
-indexing run. This is much faster than the non-lazy check, but won't update
+previous time this directory was checked.
-messages that have change (rather than having been added or removed), since
+
-merely editing a message does not update the directory time-stamp. Of course,
+This is much faster than the non-lazy check, but won't update messages that have
-you can run *mu-index* occasionally without *--lazy-check*, to pick up such
+changed (rather than having been added or removed), since merely editing a
-messages.
+message does not update the directory time-stamp. Of course, you can run
+*mu-index* occasionally without *--lazy-check*, to pick up such messages.
+
+Furthermore, in lazy-check mode, files which have a *ctime* smaller than the time
+the previous indexing operation was completed, are ignored. This helps for the
+use-case where new messages can appear in big maildirs.
 
 ** --nocleanup
 Disable the database cleanup that *mu* does by default after indexing.
@@ -185,7 +190,7 @@ ok 1 /bench/indexer/4-cores
 #+end_example
 
 Things are again a little faster, even though the index does a lot more now
-(text-normalizatian, and pre-generating message-sexps). A faster machine helps,
+(text-normalization, and pre-generating message-sexps). A faster machine helps,
 too!
 
 ** recent releases