tests: move to subdir, move to meson
De-clutter the source directories a bit. Ensure tests build with meson, and remove from autotools in a few places (no need to do things twice).
This commit is contained in:
230
lib/tests/testdir/cur/1220863060.12663_3.mindcrime!2,S
Normal file
230
lib/tests/testdir/cur/1220863060.12663_3.mindcrime!2,S
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
|
||||
Return-Path: <sqlite-dev-bounces@sqlite.org>
|
||||
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mindcrime
|
||||
X-Spam-Level:
|
||||
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE
|
||||
autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
|
||||
X-Original-To: xxxx@localhost
|
||||
Delivered-To: xxxx@localhost
|
||||
Received: from mindcrime (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
||||
by mail.xxxxsoftware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D724F6963B
|
||||
for <xxxx@localhost>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:49:27 +0300 (EEST)
|
||||
Delivered-To: xxxx.klub@gmail.com
|
||||
Received: from gmail-imap.l.google.com [72.14.221.111]
|
||||
by mindcrime with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.8)
|
||||
for <xxxx@localhost> (single-drop); Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:49:27 +0300 (EEST)
|
||||
Received: by 10.142.51.12 with SMTP id y12cs86537wfy; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:38:51
|
||||
-0700 (PDT)
|
||||
Received: by 10.151.113.5 with SMTP id q5mr272266ybm.37.1217835529913; Mon, 04
|
||||
Aug 2008 00:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
|
||||
Received: from sqlite.org (sqlite.org [67.18.92.124]) by mx.google.com with
|
||||
ESMTP id 5si5754915ywd.8.2008.08.04.00.38.30; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:38:50 -0700
|
||||
(PDT)
|
||||
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
|
||||
sqlite-dev-bounces@sqlite.org designates 67.18.92.124 as permitted sender)
|
||||
client-ip=67.18.92.124;
|
||||
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record
|
||||
for domain of sqlite-dev-bounces@sqlite.org designates 67.18.92.124 as
|
||||
permitted sender) smtp.mail=sqlite-dev-bounces@sqlite.org
|
||||
Received: from sqlite.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sqlite.org (Postfix) with
|
||||
ESMTP id 765A511C46; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:38:27 -0400 (EDT)
|
||||
X-Original-To: sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
Delivered-To: sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.176])
|
||||
by sqlite.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C59511C41 for <sqlite-dev@sqlite.org>;
|
||||
Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
|
||||
Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so2163423ika.0 for
|
||||
<sqlite-dev@sqlite.org>; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
|
||||
Received: by 10.210.54.19 with SMTP id c19mr14589042eba.107.1217835502549;
|
||||
Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
|
||||
Received: by 10.210.115.10 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
|
||||
Message-ID: <477821040808040038s381bf382p7411451e3c1a2e4e@mail.gmail.com>
|
||||
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:38:22 +0300
|
||||
From: anon@example.com
|
||||
To: sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
In-Reply-To: <73d4fc50808030747g303a170ieac567723c2d4f24@mail.gmail.com>
|
||||
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
||||
References: <477821040808030533y41f1501dq32447b568b6e6ca5@mail.gmail.com>
|
||||
<73d4fc50808030747g303a170ieac567723c2d4f24@mail.gmail.com>
|
||||
Subject: Re: [sqlite-dev] SQLite exception A&B
|
||||
X-BeenThere: sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
|
||||
Priority: normal
|
||||
Reply-To: sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
List-Id: <sqlite-dev.sqlite.org>
|
||||
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev>,
|
||||
<mailto:sqlite-dev-request@sqlite.org?subject=unsubscribe>
|
||||
List-Archive: <http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/private/sqlite-dev>
|
||||
List-Post: <mailto:sqlite-dev@sqlite.org>
|
||||
List-Help: <mailto:sqlite-dev-request@sqlite.org?subject=help>
|
||||
List-Subscribe: <http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev>,
|
||||
<mailto:sqlite-dev-request@sqlite.org?subject=subscribe>
|
||||
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2123623832=="
|
||||
Mime-version: 1.0
|
||||
Sender: sqlite-dev-bounces@sqlite.org
|
||||
Errors-To: sqlite-dev-bounces@sqlite.org
|
||||
Content-Length: 8475
|
||||
|
||||
--===============2123623832==
|
||||
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
|
||||
boundary="----=_Part_29556_25702991.1217835502493"
|
||||
|
||||
------=_Part_29556_25702991.1217835502493
|
||||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
|
||||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
||||
Content-Disposition: inline
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Grant,
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for your reply.
|
||||
I am using a different session for each thread, whenever a thread wishes to
|
||||
access the database it gets a session from the session pool and works with
|
||||
that session until its work is done.
|
||||
|
||||
Most of the actions the threads are doing on the database are quite
|
||||
complicated and are required to be fully committed or completely ignored, so
|
||||
yes, I am (most of the time) explicitly beginning and committing my
|
||||
transactions.
|
||||
|
||||
Regarding the SQLiteStatementImpl, I believe the Poco manual explains that
|
||||
sessions and statements for that matter cannot be shared between threads,
|
||||
therefore if you are using a session via one thread only it should work
|
||||
fine.
|
||||
|
||||
My first impression was that the problem was in the Poco infrastructure (I
|
||||
have found several Poco related bugs in the past), but the problem ALWAYS
|
||||
occurs when I perform the "BEGIN IMMEDIATE" action, if it were a Poco
|
||||
related bug, I would expect to see it here and there without any relation to
|
||||
this specific statement, but that is not the case.
|
||||
|
||||
None the less, I will also post my question on the Poco forums.
|
||||
|
||||
Nadav.
|
||||
|
||||
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Grant Gatchel <grant.gatchel@gmail.com>wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
> Are you using the same Poco::Session for every thread or does each call
|
||||
> create a new session/handle to the database?
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Are you explicitly BEGINning and COMMITting your transactions?
|
||||
>
|
||||
> In looking at the 1.3.2 branch of Poco::Data::SQLite, there appears to be a
|
||||
> race condition in the SQLiteStatementImpl::next() method in which the member
|
||||
> _nextResponse is being accessed before the SQLiteStatementImpl::hasNext()
|
||||
> method has a chance to interpret that value and throw an exception.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> This question might be more suitable in the Poco forums or mailinglist.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - Grant
|
||||
>
|
||||
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:33 AM, nadav g <nadav.gr@gmail.com> wrote:
|
||||
>
|
||||
>> Hi All,
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> I have been using SQLite with Poco (www.appinf.com) as my infrastructure.
|
||||
>> The program is running several threads that access this database very
|
||||
>> often and are synchronized by SQLite itself.
|
||||
>> Everything seems to work just fine most of time (usually days - weeks) but
|
||||
>> I do get an occasional exception:
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> Exception: SQL error or missing database: Iterator Error: trying to check
|
||||
>> if there is a next value
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> The backtrace leads to this statement:
|
||||
>> *"BEGIN IMMEDIATE"*
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> This specific code runs numerous times before an exception occurs (if
|
||||
>> occurs at all) and I cannot think of any reason for it to fail later rather
|
||||
>> than sooner.
|
||||
>> It is pretty obvious that this situation occurs due to some rare thread
|
||||
>> state, but I could not find any information that gives me any hint as to
|
||||
>> what this state might be.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> So what I am asking is:
|
||||
>> 1) Does anyone know why this sort of exception occurs?
|
||||
>> 2) Can anyone think of a reason for such an exception to occur in the
|
||||
>> situation I have described?
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> Thanks in advance,
|
||||
>> Nadav.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> _______________________________________________
|
||||
>> sqlite-dev mailing list
|
||||
>> sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
>> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>
|
||||
> _______________________________________________
|
||||
> sqlite-dev mailing list
|
||||
> sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev
|
||||
>
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
------=_Part_29556_25702991.1217835502493
|
||||
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
|
||||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
||||
Content-Disposition: inline
|
||||
|
||||
<div dir="ltr">Hi Grant,<br><br>Thanks for your reply.<br>I am using a different session for each thread, whenever a thread wishes to access the database it gets a session from the session pool and works with that session until its work is done.<br>
|
||||
<br>Most of the actions the threads are doing on the database are quite complicated and are required to be fully committed or completely ignored, so yes, I am (most of the time) explicitly beginning and committing my transactions.<br>
|
||||
<br>Regarding the SQLiteStatementImpl, I believe the Poco manual explains that sessions and statements for that matter cannot be shared between threads, therefore if you are using a session via one thread only it should work fine.<br>
|
||||
<br>My first impression was that the problem was in the Poco infrastructure (I have found several Poco related bugs in the past), but the problem ALWAYS occurs when I perform the "BEGIN IMMEDIATE" action, if it were a Poco related bug, I would expect to see it here and there without any relation to this specific statement, but that is not the case.<br>
|
||||
<br>None the less, I will also post my question on the Poco forums.<br><br>Nadav.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Grant Gatchel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:grant.gatchel@gmail.com">grant.gatchel@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
|
||||
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="ltr">Are you using the same Poco::Session for every thread or does each call create a new session/handle to the database?<br>
|
||||
<br>Are you explicitly BEGINning and COMMITting your transactions?<br><br>In looking at the 1.3.2 branch of Poco::Data::SQLite, there appears to be a race condition in the SQLiteStatementImpl::next() method in which the member _nextResponse is being accessed before the SQLiteStatementImpl::hasNext() method has a chance to interpret that value and throw an exception.<br>
|
||||
|
||||
<br>This question might be more suitable in the Poco forums or mailinglist.<br><br>- Grant<br>
|
||||
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
|
||||
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:33 AM, nadav g <span dir="ltr"><<a href="http://nadav.gr" target="_blank">nadav.gr</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
|
||||
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<div dir="ltr">Hi All,<br><br>I have been using SQLite with Poco (<a href="http://www.appinf.com" target="_blank">www.appinf.com</a>) as my infrastructure.<br>The program is running several threads that access this database very often and are synchronized by SQLite itself.<br>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Everything seems to work just fine most of time (usually days - weeks) but I do get an occasional exception:<br><br>Exception: SQL error or missing database: Iterator Error: trying to check if there is a next value<br><br>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The backtrace leads to this statement:<br><b>"BEGIN IMMEDIATE"</b><br><br>This specific code runs numerous times before an exception occurs (if occurs at all) and I cannot think of any reason for it to fail later rather than sooner.<br>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
It is pretty obvious that this situation occurs due to some rare thread state, but I could not find any information that gives me any hint as to what this state might be.<br><br>So what I am asking is:<br>1) Does anyone know why this sort of exception occurs?<br>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2) Can anyone think of a reason for such an exception to occur in the situation I have described?<br><br>Thanks in advance,<br>Nadav.<br><br></div>
|
||||
<br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
|
||||
sqlite-dev mailing list<br>
|
||||
<a href="mailto:sqlite-dev@sqlite.org" target="_blank">sqlite-dev@sqlite.org</a><br>
|
||||
<a href="http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev" target="_blank">http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev</a><br>
|
||||
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
|
||||
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
|
||||
sqlite-dev mailing list<br>
|
||||
<a href="mailto:sqlite-dev@sqlite.org">sqlite-dev@sqlite.org</a><br>
|
||||
<a href="http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev" target="_blank">http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev</a><br>
|
||||
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
|
||||
|
||||
------=_Part_29556_25702991.1217835502493--
|
||||
|
||||
--===============2123623832==
|
||||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
|
||||
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
||||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
||||
Content-Disposition: inline
|
||||
|
||||
_______________________________________________
|
||||
sqlite-dev mailing list
|
||||
sqlite-dev@sqlite.org
|
||||
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-dev
|
||||
|
||||
--===============2123623832==--
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user